HIS202 Foothill College Anglo Saxon Ideologies in 1920s to 1930s Article Review

Recommendation

The instructor recommends allotting 300 minutes to complete this assignment. Time Recommendation: 180 minutes to read the academic journal article and 120 minutes to write and edit the 2-page review. This is only a recommendation, you may spend more or less time on this assignment depending on your ability and availability.

Introduction

Historians love to review the works of other historians. Whenever a new history book is written, the historical profession selects experts in particular fields of studies to determine the value and contribution the new work will have on the academic discipline. Upon completion of the course’s reading, each student will be considered an expert and be required to read an academic article and submit a 2-page review (minimum). Students are encouraged to celebrate the author’s accomplishments, but also challenge anything that seems substandard. Style and creativity play a crucial role in the success of your review.

Pick one of the Academic Journal Articles below:

Format

  • Two pages (minimum)
  • 12 point font
  • Double spaced
  • Paragraphs

Each paper should include the following:

  1. The author’s purpose in writing the article
  2. The author’s main thesis
  3. The author’s challenging of other historical viewpoints
  4. The evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources)
  5. Personal likes/dislikes
  6. How could the author make the work stronger?
  7. The recommended audience for the article?
  8. Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United States
  9. An example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty
  10. Suggested reading to accompany this work (not required, but helpful)

Helpful Information

Instructions for Submitting

  • On the right-hand side of the screen click on the icon that says “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT”
  • Click on the tab “File Upload” to attach your AJA Review.
  • Click on the tab “Text Entry” if you wish to copy and paste OR write your review in the box provided.
  • Be sure to click “SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT” after you finishing uploading the document. If you need help converting pages click on this link.

评分标准说明

The AJA Rubric (1) (1)

The AJA Rubric (1) (1)

标准 等级 得分

此标准已链接至学习结果Page and Format Requirement

30.0 得分

Meets minimum page requirement (2 full pages).

5.0 得分

Does not meet minimum page requirement (1.5 pages or less)

30.0

此标准已链接至学习结果AJA Requirements and Quality

30.0 得分

Answers the specific AJA requirements. Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.

25.0 得分

Answers most of the AJA requirements, however, may miss one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.

20.0 得分

Answers many of the AJA requirements, however, missed more than one of the following (thesis, purpose, relationship to history, or target audience). Incorporates pertinent and detailed information from scholarly work. Maintains focus/avoids being sidetracked by tangents. Presents all information clearly and concisely and in an organized manner. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.

15.0 得分

May have met all the AJA requirements, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Presents information in a manner that is sometimes unclear, and/or has significant organization problems. Avoids distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems.

10.0 得分

May have met all the AJA requirement, however did not incorporate pertinent and detailed information from the scholarly work and/or sidetracked off into a reactionary tangent. Provides no information that can be understood or related to the specific topic May lack any recognizable organization May contain enough distracting grammar/spelling/etc. problems to make it substantially incomprehensible.

30.0

此标准已链接至学习结果Primary Source Identification

20.0 得分

Identified 3 specific primary sources.

15.0 得分

Identified 2 specific primary sources.

10.0 得分

Identified 1 specific primary source.

8.0 得分

Identified primary sources, but not specific.

1.0 得分

Identified the wrong source.

0.0 得分

No attempt made to identify primary sources.

20.0

此标准已链接至学习结果Textbook Critical Analysis

20.0 得分

Support/contradict the textbook with a direct quote from textbook.

15.0 得分

Support/contradiction validated with page number or chapter reference instead of a direct quote.

10.0 得分

Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Does include a generalized narrative of why support/contradict the textbook.

5.0 得分

Support/contradiction asserted without any specific validation from the textbook using a direct quote. Also lacks any sort of generalize narrative of why support or contradiction was proposed.

2.0 得分

Student stated that it did not support or contradict the textbook without validation.

1.0 得分

Student obviously did not read the book so their analysis of support or contradiction is too general, too vague, and/or incorrect.

0.0 得分

No support/contradiction of the textbook.

20.0

总得分: 100.0 ,满分 100.0

<a href="https://smccd.instructure.com/courses/22272/modules/items/738551" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Reaction Forum Discussion 4: The New Deal” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>上一页下一页

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

CLICK ORDER NOW TO GET A CUSTOMIZED PAPER ON THIS TOPIC JUST FOR YOU!! 0%PLAGIARISM 100% ORIGINAL PAPER

8 Responses to “HIS202 Foothill College Anglo Saxon Ideologies in 1920s to 1930s Article Review”

  1. 538672 500741Im not certain exactly why but this web website is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my finish? Ill check back later and see if the issue still exists. 980725

  2. DevSecOps says:

    617223 968298I was suggested this blog by way of my cousin. Im no longer confident whether or not this put up is written by him as nobody else realize such detailed about my trouble. You are fantastic! Thanks! 566357

  3. 102586 771789Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I is going to be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently swiftly. 273518

  4. More Bonuses says:

    571142 215009if this post was likened to a flavor of yogurt, what flavor would it be? Banana, I feel. 999909

  5. 872163 799792Just wanna comment that you have a really nice site, I the style and style it really stands out. 805090

  6. 475016 186808Yeah bookmaking this wasnt a bad decision wonderful post! . 477685

  7. 241613 954633Soon after examine a couple of of the weblog posts on your web site now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and shall be checking once again soon. Pls try my website online as well and let me know what you believe. 759846

  8. 183052 92999In fact your creative writing skills has encouraged me to get my own website now. Actually the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a good example of it. 952260

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: buy backlinks | Thanks to webdesign berlin, House Plans and voucher codes