HUM101 Colorado State Guardian View on Abortion Essay

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Arguments and Meaning in Social Issues

Directions:
Using the concepts learned through the readings and lecture pages, select one social issue that particularly interests you. Now find a newspaper editorial on the subject and construct an outline of an argument made on the subject. Be sure to distinguish between an argument and an explanation. For a good example of how you might approach this, see page 46ff of van Cleave (2016).

What are the main conclusions? Premises? What premises are missing? What is their conclusion? Using external scholarly sources, can you determine if the argument is sound? (Refer to Van Cleave, 2016, Chapter 1.) Is the argument inductive, deductive, or a mixture of both? You should employ the principle of charity to understand the argument at hand.

Requirements:

Option #2: Engaging Conversational Arguments

Directions:
Using the concepts learned through the readings and lecture pages, select one social issue that particularly interests a close friend or relative. Interview this person about the subject and ask them about an argument they would make about the topic. Be sure to distinguish between an argument and an explanation. Now, reconstruct their argument using the standard argument form. For a good example of how you might approach this, see page 46ff of van Cleave (2016).

What are their main conclusions? Premises? What premises are missing? What is their conclusion? Using external scholarly sources, can you determine if the argument is sound? Is the argument inductive, deductive, or a mixture of both? You should employ the principle of charity to understand the argument at hand.

Requirements:

Required

Recommended

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 3 CT

HUM101 Mod 3 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking

25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

CLICK ORDER NOW TO GET A CUSTOMIZED PAPER ON THIS TOPIC JUST FOR YOU!! 0%PLAGIARISM 100% ORIGINAL PAPER

6 Responses to “HUM101 Colorado State Guardian View on Abortion Essay”

  1. 76938 474968oh properly, Alicia silverstone is matured nowadays but when she was nonetheless younger, she is the sex symbol of hollywood` 880226

  2. 950858 845896whoa, this really is a actually very good piece of information. I read about something like this before, this really is impressively great stuff. 832299

  3. 578950 466383We will provide deal reviews, deal coaching, and follow up to ensure you win the deals you cant afford to lose. 45930

  4. 131459 548552I like this weblog so considerably, saved to my bookmarks . 21011

  5. 670479 475397I enjoy your writing style truly enjoying this internet web site . 260688

  6. 664580 887072Hello! I basically would wish to offer a huge thumbs up for that fantastic information youve here during this post. I will likely be returning to your web site to get a lot more soon. 704111

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: buy backlinks | Thanks to webdesign berlin, House Plans and voucher codes