Individual Difference and Performance Sheet

Individual Differences and Performance – Research Assignment Instructions

Scoring ID is WU90GH.

Please refer to the attachment for the below questions.

Word limit: 2250 words, not including end-text references and appendix. Note: Please do not exceed the word limit – your marker will stop marking your answers at the word limit, and further content will not be assessed. Referencing Style: APA6. Formatting: 12pt Times New Roman, double line spacing, no additional spaces between paragraphs. Note: Pages documents cannot be uploaded to LMS. Please convert them to .docx, .doc, or .pdf before submitting. Total marks: 40. Outline Based on your results from completing the 120-item IPIP (Maples, Guan, Carter, & Miller, 2014) representative of the NEO-PI-R domains of personality, this research assignment asks you to complete a review of your results and their potential implications based on findings from published literature.

There are three major questions to be answered as part this assignment.

1. Using your PSY391 peers as a point of comparison, what do your scores on the 120-item IPIP by Maples et al. (2014) suggest about the five major trait domains of your personality? When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer: • Provide a standardised statistical indicator (e.g., a Z score) for each of your five domain scores that allows you to describe how much higher, lower, or approximately average you are on each trait domain in comparison to your PSY391 peers. o Hint: You can treat the PSY391 peer data as population data when calculating your Z score. • Based on your IPIP scores, describe what traits for each domain would be more or less characteristic of you in comparison to your peers in the unit. • Based on your IPIP scores and their implications for your personality traits described above, how accurately does this correspond with how you see yourself in comparison to your peers? Provide examples for each domain to substantiate your answer. • Provide a Figure or Figures in your Appendix that demonstrates the distribution of the PSY391 cohort on each domain, and where your score sits on the distribution for each domain.

2. Based on findings from published academic literature, what do your scores on the five personality trait domains suggest about your predicted academic performance at university? When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer: • Provide a concise summary of the academic literature that has addressed the five personality domains and their expected relationships with tertiary academic performance. • Based on your perceptions of your academic performance, do your IPIP results support the predicted relationships between personality traits and academic performance? Provide examples to substantiate your answer for the relevant trait domains.

3. What validity considerations are important when looking at the relationship between your personality domain scores and their predictions about your academic performance? When answering this question, please address the following as part of your answer: • What aspects of validity may impede or strengthen the accuracy of your trait domain scores as predictors of academic performance? Provide examples to substantiate how these aspects of validity may be directly relevant to the accuracy of these relationships.
Format Please number your answers in your assignment (e.g., 1., 2., 3.) to make it clear to your marker which question you are addressing. Students should address each of the previous questions in a short answer format (i.e., using paragraphs to directly answer the questions, without needing to add introductory or concluding paragraphs to each answer as you would with an essay-style answer), referring to published academic literature where appropriate. Use citations where appropriate per APA6 style. Writing succinctly and directly addressing the components of each question is highly recommended. Include Figure/s following your References in an Appendix section.

Marking Rubric A demonstration version of the rubric used to mark your research assignment is available on LMS.

References Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120item IPIP-based measure of the Five-Factor Model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 10701084. doi:10.1037/pas0000004

You may find browsing through the information available on the IPIP website (http://ipip.ori.org) useful when working on this assignment.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

CLICK ORDER NOW TO GET A CUSTOMIZED PAPER ON THIS TOPIC JUST FOR YOU!! 0%PLAGIARISM 100% ORIGINAL PAPER

7 Responses to “Individual Difference and Performance Sheet”

  1. 438560 394152I must spend a while finding out much more or understanding more. Thank you for great information I used to be searching for this info for my mission. 292902

  2. judi bola says:

    771682 381768Some genuinely quality weblog posts on this web site, saved to fav. 694207

  3. 686077 18704Basically a smiling visitor here to share the enjoy (:, btw outstanding style . “Audacity, far more audacity and always audacity.” by Georges Jacques Danton. 828242

  4. 909690 491140Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything in this way before. So nice to locate somebody by original thoughts on this topic. realy thanks for beginning this up. this fabulous website is one thing that is necessary on the internet, a person with a bit of originality. beneficial project for bringing a new challenge towards internet! 315895

  5. Previous: Gucci, Vuitton Lewis, Housing is a very good name in the world.

  6. Jane Lejeune says:

    Diamond Yellow Leaves, Playback, Gift.

  7. The best rock is not responsible for 1 of the international market.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: buy backlinks | Thanks to webdesign berlin, House Plans and voucher codes