Response to cyber deterrence policy and Competency for becoming evidence-based leader

A cyber deterrence policy is attainable to provide guidelines to reacting to cyber events from state or non-state perpetrators. However, reaction must be of a clear line of accusation and proof as with the cyber domain it is difficult to align a specific culprit. For instance, through our readings, it is easy to access a server or even access a point through a wi-fi device or influence of a mobile smart phone. Origin can easily be erased; therefore, pinpointing a specific physical person, group, or country is difficult as compared to conventional weapons where there is a clear line of start to finish. Other practical problems in regards to deterring cyber attacks is the escalation of force. An intrusion through espionage may lead to physical damage of systems and escalate to the point of war.

However, solutions are sometimes easier said than done as mentioned by author Libicki (2009), “Fourth, everyone does it. Those who try to establish deterrence policies to prevent others from doing what they do themselves perforce reveal themselves to be fools or hypocrites—unless they are so powerful that they can get away with it. It is doubtful whether even the United States qualifies as being that powerful. A deterrence posture against CNE would be viewed as hypocritical and probably not credible—indeed, as incredible” (p. 24). Moreover, another potential solution rather than being a hypocrite is through a show of force by presenting to the international community the capability that a nation has and the ability to execute it, such as the parading of ICBMs or even the utilization of them through posted recordings. Tying it to cyber deterrence is the use of attacks on another nation and the vocalization of taking ownership for the destruction of a system.

Furthermore, US policy of cyber deterrence should be explicit and implicit. I know that sounds like a double-edged sword where policy is conflicting. My reasoning is that it really depends on the actions a society would need to take. Whether it is deterrence through punishment or denial. I think that deterrence through punishment must be driven by explicit requirements as the response or reaction by a state or actor must have definitive proof that intent was malicious and not accidental through self-negligence. Additionally, implicit policy can be provided to deterrence through denial as there are various solutions to a problem that can limit or prevent further intrusions. Actions of denial does not have the same affects as punishment such as international affects which may pull various nations into conflict when in actuality, only a singular culprit is to blame whether internally or externally.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


15 Responses to “Response to cyber deterrence policy and Competency for becoming evidence-based leader”

  1. 4141 651508I dont normally comment but I gotta say thankyou for the post on this remarkable 1 : D. 806930

  2. 833044 937380I consider something really unique in this web site. 382874

  3. 256836 109135Oh my goodness! a amazing post dude. Thanks a good deal Nevertheless I is going to be experiencing trouble with ur rss . Dont know why Not able to sign up for it. Is there every person acquiring identical rss problem? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 392840

  4. CI-CD says:

    122738 71110I enjoy the helpful info you supply inside your articles. 720135

  5. 999065 310586I got what you mean ,bookmarked , quite good internet site . 115864

  6. 289190 613253Great post is going to be linking this on a few websites of mine keep up the very good work. 8856

  7. 354116 546783The digital cigarette makes use of a battery and a small heating element the vaporize the e-liquid. This vapor can then be inhaled and exhaled 965280

  8. 299828 466574woah i like yur internet site. It actually helped me with the info i wus seeking for. thank you, will save. 167754

  9. 30785 990752yourselfm as burning with excitement along accumulative concentrating. alter ego was rather apocalyptic by the mated ethical self went up to. It is punk up to closed ego dispirited. All respecting those topics are movables her ought to discover no finish touching unpronounced. Thanks so much! 855522

  10. This is very good for the Netherlands.

  11. 223,000 Arranet (model: IW503601) Laura Morning Morning Dauraja Laura Group.

  12. fb username says:

    278173 524240if the buffalo in my head could speak german i would not know a god damm thing. What i do know is that the language of art is out of this world. 13863

  13. Rene Piecuch says:

    A beautiful American girl.

  14. 토토 says:

    445766 64007I discovered your weblog post internet website on the search engines and appearance several of your early posts. Always preserve the top notch operate. I additional the Feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading much a lot more on your part down the line! 662683

  15. 15574 245767Amaze! Thank you! I constantly wished to produce in my internet website a thing like that. Can I take element with the publish to my weblog? 624043

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: buy backlinks | Thanks to webdesign berlin, House Plans and voucher codes