Read the assigned case Muncy v. City of Dallas, 335 F. 3rd. 394 (5th Cir. 2003). Before you read the court’s decision determine how you would find if you were the judge. Write a discussion post based on your decision. After your post, go back in the case. Were you correct? Did the court find the way you thought they would find? Did they do so for the same reasons? Post a reflective post on your analysis of the case versus the court’s analysis.
The following is provided to assist you in knowing how your responses are graded for class participation
Discussion Posting (one point)
1.Provides concrete examples from the readings to support postings.
2.Integrates prior readings in postings.
3.Integrates personal observations and knowledge in an accurate and highly insightful way.
4.Presents new observations.
5.Word choice and sentence structure are suitable for graduate level work.
6.Posts are organized and information is presented in a logical sequence.
APA is the American Psychological Association, and the style is one of many in the academic world used to regulate the language, citations, procedure, and formatting of manuscripts and other examples of writing in the social sciences. Please be consistent throughout each written paper. Refer to APA Guide under Resources on the Course Menu for APA specifics.Wikipedia is not an appropriate source for any scholarly writing and will not be accepted. At least 500 words